COMPARISON

Wattvalio vs Excel: spreadsheet or software for your renewables business plan?

Excel is the historical tool of project finance — and it does the job to get started. The real question is not “can Excel do it?” but “what does reliability cost once the project must be bankable?”. An honest comparison, criterion by criterion.

The comparison, criterion by criterion

CriterionExcel spreadsheetWattvalio
Learning curveImmediate — everyone knows ExcelGuided tabs (generation → sales → debt → results)
Modelling flexibilityTotal: any formula, anywhereStructured assumptions with project-finance conventions built in
Formula-error riskReal and silent (one shifted reference corrupts the whole model without warning)Single calculation engine, locked by automated non-regression tests
Scenarios & versionsFile duplication ("BP_final_v3_REAL.xlsx") — silent divergenceIsolated versions per project: duplicate, compare, lock, archive
Traceability (who changed what)None natively; workbook history stays partialField-level audit trail: old value → new value, author, date
P50 / P90 generationHand-built, rarely propagated everywhereNative across the chain: revenues, lender DSCR, exports
Actuals vs budgetRe-typed into new tabs, manual reconciliationDedicated tab (entry + import), variances per metric × year, reforecast anchored on actuals
Lender packageManual formatting at every iterationOne-click P50/P90 export with banking conventions (annual flows, year-end stocks)
Consolidated portfolioFragile linked workbooks (broken links, out-of-sync versions)Native holdings/SPVs: ownership, dividends, shareholder loans, NAV/SOTP
Collaboration & access rightsShared or e-mailed file — who has the right version?Multi-user, per-project roles, per-organisation isolation
Data securityDepends on individual discipline (local files, attachments)EU hosting, multi-tenant isolation at database level (row-level security)
CostOffice licence already in placeSaaS subscription (access by invitation)

Where Excel remains the right choice

  • Prototyping an idea in an hour, before you even know the project deserves a full model.
  • A one-off ad hoc analysis that will never be replayed or handed over.
  • A model mastered by a single person, with no reviewer and no bank across the table — for as long as that stays true.

Where the spreadsheet breaks

Formula errors are silent

A reference shifted by one row, an inverted sign, a frozen range that no longer covers the new columns: the workbook keeps displaying numbers — wrong ones. In due diligence, the analyst across the table is the one who finds them. Wattvalio has a single calculation engine covered by non-regression tests: any drift in IRR, NPV or DSCR blocks the release before it reaches your figures.

“Versions” are file copies

BP_v3_final_REAL_2.xlsx: every scenario is a file, every file diverges, and nobody knows which one went to the investment committee. In Wattvalio, each version is isolated (its assumptions never affect the others), comparable, lockable and archivable — with a journal of who changed what, when, from which value to which value.

Multi-asset consolidation is fragile

Linked workbooks break at the first rename and drift out of sync silently. The Wattvalio portfolio is native: per-SPV ownership, dividend up-streaming, shareholder loans, NAV/SOTP valuation and valuation bridge — recomputed together on every change.

Tracking actuals is manual work

Comparing budget to actuals means new tabs and manual reconciliation. Wattvalio has an Actuals tab (entry or xlsx/csv import), variances per metric and per year using banking conventions, and a reforecast anchored on actuals: the past displayed as booked, the future recomputed from the real cash position and debt outstanding.

What about your Excel files?

You keep them. Wattvalio exports to Excel — P50/P90 lender package, full business plan, investor pack — and imports your accounting actuals from a template. The spreadsheet stays the exchange format with your banks and investors; it simply stops being your calculation engine.

For the full method, see the solar & photovoltaic business plan guide, the bankable financing dossier and the solar business plan software.

Frequently asked questions

Can you build a serious solar business plan in Excel?

Yes — Excel remains the historical tool of project finance, and a well-built model can be bankable. The real question is the cost of reliability over time: every iteration, scenario and additional asset multiplies the risk of a silent formula error, and due diligence requires justifying every figure. That reliability work is what dedicated software industrialises.

When does Excel remain the right choice?

To prototype an idea in an hour, for a one-off ad hoc analysis that will never be replayed, or when the model is mastered end-to-end by one person who never has to hand it over. As soon as there are several scenarios, several assets, several reviewers or a bank across the table, the spreadsheet becomes the weakest link.

Do you have to abandon your Excel files to use Wattvalio?

No. Wattvalio exports to Excel (P50/P90 lender package, full business plan, investor pack) and imports accounting actuals from an xlsx/csv template. The spreadsheet stays your exchange format; it simply stops being your calculation engine.

How does Wattvalio guarantee calculation correctness?

The calculation engine is unique and covered by hundreds of automated tests, including a locked set of reference values: any drift in an indicator (IRR, NPV, DSCR, LCOE) fails the release before it reaches your numbers. Every changed assumption is journaled, and every result unrolls line by line in the Computations tab.

Compare on your own numbers

Bring your Excel model — we replay it in Wattvalio with you.

Request access